I’m quoting this Hundertwasser idea (below) because I’m interested in human purpose and creativity. I don’t think we’re meant to be deconstructed into cogs in the Corporate machine, obedient and defined by tasks, job descriptions and money. That is Modernity gone mad. I think the corporate machine is an example of a rationalised insanity, not unlike the rationalisation of Moonies or the Jonestown cult, a form of Assimilation into the Borg Collective, and I think one day people will wake up and realise.
I have watched from the inside public departments shift from engaged, ethical, thinking, civil service spaces where mavericks and the odd eccentric could find a home, to a hierarchical managerial power game with petty types counting meaningless and distortionary beans to suit the meanest of minds, who were promptly promoted.
And I wonder what is the effect of that extension of Corporate thinking and economic reduction of life to a dollar; what it actually DOES to not just the people who work in these places, but also our people, Te Tangata, the citizens, the public – oh, pardon me – the ‘clients’, the ‘customers’, the ‘consumers’ – mere objects upon which we act, defined by their cost or revenue generation, not their souls, their qualities, their values, their creativity.
“He said it’s because of the prevailing conformism of the populace and the determination of the State to regiment every aspect of life: ‘When you take away the impetus of creativity of every citizen, then people tend to think they are not needed, there’s no demand for their ideas, and they become apathetic. Most suicides come from apathy. ….. You don’t have to think.’ “
I know nothing about suicide, but I think that living without a purpose is, well, meaningless. That is tautological, surely. Purposelessness is purposeless. And if you reduce meaning to the accumulation of money, or power, then I would have to ask what meaning you place on the value of money, or power.
And please don’t try to convince me that such people “create value”. A poet creates value with the beauty and depth of imagery and metre; a person who makes the lives of others richer in meaning and joy creates value; those who inspire; those who lift the damaged soul; those who heal a landscape and makes it hum with all the richness of life and resilience create value; an artist who holds a mirror to the world, a philosopher the same, a great scientist that deepens both our understanding and our appreciation of this universe we live in creates value; those who heal people and soul and open our eyes to different ways of seeing; those who show us what tomorrow could be.
Some may create value AND generate money. I have no problem with that. Some artists even make money! But I see a lot of big Corporate activity that is essentially extractive and degrading, especially in my field of rural land use systems and provincial communities. Rather than creating life, they exchange life for money. The lives of others. The life of landscapes. I don’t see their point. Why would you be part of that, even if you were on a few million a year?
Unless …. power and money are the only consolation for a glass ego? Is that the alternative to suicidal thoughts? Dominance? Control? The manic thrill of pillage?
A friend once told me his old school colleagues who had since retied to Wanaka after lives as Corporate lawyers and accountants had “empty eyes”.
What is the point of a life that ends with empty eyes?